WASHINGTON 鈥 Initiative 77 was overturned Tuesday by a vote of the D.C. Council.
The measure, approved by D.C. voters in June, would have eliminated the city’s two-tier minimum wage system. It would have raised the minimum wage for tipped workers, such as waiters and bartenders, incrementally until their minimum wage matched that of other workers in the city by 2020.
Council members approving the repeal said the measure’s wording was misleading 鈥 people who voted for the measure, they said, likely didn’t realize they voted to cut the pay of many workers and place an undue burden on small businesses that would have to either raise prices or cut staff to pay for what would become much larger payrolls.
The council is still considering what鈥檚 called a compromise bill, which would aim to address issues that Initiative 77 sought to solve 鈥 such as sexual harassment and wage theft by employers who fail to make up the difference when tipped workers don’t earn minimum wage, as the employers are supposed to.
Council Chairman Phil Mendelson called the wording of Initiative 77 鈥渕isleading at best, dishonest at worst.鈥 He said that several of the provisions of the bill presented as new were in fact current D.C. law anyway.
He also said that about 60 tipped workers 鈥 who 鈥淚nitiative 77 purports to help鈥 鈥 had testified last month in support of repeal.
Addressing the criticism that repealing a voter initiative was anti-democratic, Mendelson said, 鈥淭he committee views the initiative like any other piece of legislation, and the council amends laws all the time. If a law is a bad law, it should be amended or repealed; it does not matter if the law was adopted by Congress, the voters or the council.鈥
Council Member Robert White, an at-large member, voted against Initiative 77 in June鈥檚 primary but on Tuesday opposed repealing it, saying, 鈥淚 cannot and will not ignore the clear vote of the residents on this issue just because I disagree with the outcome.鈥
He agreed that the language was 鈥渄eceptive,鈥 but said, 鈥淚 cannot assume that voters were ignorant or uninformed after the vigorous campaign waged by both sides.鈥
White added that 鈥淭he voters are the source of any authority that I hold,鈥 and that referenda should be repealed only in extreme cases.
He cited the lack of voting representation for D.C. in Congress, and the steps the federal government sometimes takes in D.C.鈥檚 affairs, as affronts to democracy, and said of overturning a ballot initiative, 鈥淲hat signal does it send?鈥
The vote was 8 to 5.
Voting to repeal Initiative 77:
Chairman Phil Mendelson
Jack Evans (Ward 2)
Brandon Todd (Ward 4)
Kenyan McDuffie (Ward 5)
Vincent Gray (Ward 7)
Trayon White (Ward 8)
Anita Bonds (At-Large)
David Grosso (At-Large)
Voting against the repeal of Initiative 77:
Brianne Nadeau (Ward 1)
Mary Cheh (Ward 3)
Charles Allen (Ward 6)
Elissa Silverman (At-Large)
Robert White (At-Large)
