WASHINGTON —Ìý“You’re stalling to protect the people.”Ìý“Isn’t that the mission?”
AfterÌýfour straight weeks atop the box office throne, “Furious 7” is about to be dethroned by Marvel’s “The Avengers: Age of Ultron.” Go ahead and call it now.
Writer/director Joss Whedon will surely follow inÌýthe footsteps of his 2012Ìýsuperhero assembly, which becameÌýtheÌýtop-grossing movie of the yearÌýand the 27th all-time ().
But while “Age of Ultron” willÌýbe a similarÌýHulk SmashÌý— likely remaining theÌýyear’s top grosser until “Star Wars: Episode 7” in December —Ìýthe box office success will mostly stem from built-in brand recognition, rather than anything of merit this time around.
After years of anticipation, “Age of Ultron” feels less like the glorious culmination of its Phase 2 predecessorsÌýand more like a flawed flick at the middle of the Marvel pack, exposed by the quality of gems like “Iron Man 3,” “Captain America: The Winter Soldier” and “Guardians of the Galaxy.”
WhatÌýa shame, because the premise itselfÌýis a winner. Tony “Iron Man” Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) wants to achieve “peace in our time” by creating aÌý“suit of armorÌýaround the world” using artificial intelligence.ÌýHeÌýenlists the help ofÌýBruce “Hulk” Banner (Mark Ruffalo) to upgrade his dormant A.I. system J.A.R.V.I.S. into an experimental A.I. system namedÌýUltron (voiced by James Spader).
The duo hides the high-risk experiment from the fellowÌýAvengers — Captain America (Chris Evans), Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) and Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner) — so when Ultron turns evil and threatens the world, the superhero gang is understandably upset.
From there, fasten your seat belts and hang onto your 3D glasses — thereÌýis a lot going on in “Age of Ultron,” both visually and narratively. For a movie that’sÌýsupposed to be mindless entertainment, itÌýrequires an awfulÌýlot of thought — and not in a good way. It actually becomes hard to follow.
Thus, the excess of the film’s three biggest strengths becomeÌýits three biggest weaknesses:
Comic Camaraderie vs. CrowdedÌýCast
To start, thereÌýare so manyÌýcharacter arcs that eachÌýcan only receiveÌýlip service.ÌýOn the “good guy” side, we get hints of Iron Man’s restless ambition; Captain America’s loss of human frailty; Thor’s other-worldly guilt; Hawkeye’s quest for work-life balance; and a love story between Black Widow and Bruce Banner that redefines “it’s complicated.” On top of that,Ìýthrow in Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson), War Machine (Don Cheadle) and The Falcon (Anthony Mackey)…well, just because.
When these characters are bantering, the film is at its absolute best. The laugh-out-loudÌýquips work in high-octane action sequences (like Captain America telling Iron Man to watch his potty mouth) and slow-paced hang-out sessions (like the group hilariously taking turns trying to lift Thor’s hammer).
On the “bad guy”Ìýside,ÌýUltron is set up as an effectiveÌývillain with evilÌýintentions and a likable smartass personality, donning an impressive CGI robot body while creepily singingÌý“I’ve Got No Strings” from Disney’s “Pinocchio” (1940). Unfortunately, his apocalyptic motives become hazy as the film progresses andÌýhisÌýdemise is so sudden during the climax thatÌýit comes across asÌýridiculous.
Somewhere between the “good and bad” lie a pair of orphaned twins, the lightning-fastÌýQuicksilver (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and the mind-bending Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olsen).ÌýPlayed by a pairÌýof “Godzilla” (2014) alums, these charactersÌýsuffer from comparisons to last year’s “X-Men: Days of Future Past” (2014), whereÌýEllen Page’s Kitty Pride performed more importantÌýmind tricks andÌýEvan Peters’ Quicksilver delivered more hilarious bullet-time anticsÌýset to Jim Croce’s “Time in a Bottle.”
By the time another major character is introduced — (Paul Bettany),ÌýsportingÌýan extraterrestrialÌýheadstone — our heads our spinning. Who is that again? Why is he here? Even those who read the comics will have a hard time keeping track; imagine those who aren’t familiar.
Just because Marvel has countless compelling characters doesn’t mean they all need to be in the same movie.ÌýThere simply isn’t room to explore so manyÌýcharacter arcs in a singleÌýfilm.
Epic Spectacle vs.ÌýExhaustingÌýLength
Contrary to popular Hollywood belief,Ìýthere can be too much of a good thing, especially in 3D IMAX.
For those who believe in acclaim,ÌýconsiderÌýthe only two directors to win Academy AwardsÌýfor 3D movies. Ang Lee won forÌý“Life of Pi” (2012) by keeping hisÌý3D adventure to 127 minutes. The following year, Alfonso Cuaron won forÌý“Gravity” (2013) by giving us aÌý90-minute panic attack.
For those who believe in box office receipts, look to the summer of 2013. “Iron Man 3”Ìýkept its runtime close to two hours — and grossed $409 million domestically. By contrast,Ìý“Man of Steel” grossed $291 million, partly because it inserted too many battle sequences atÌýnearly 2 1/2 hours.
“Age of Ultron” suffers from the same Kryptonite, stuffing way too many CGI battles into a film that could better use its time exploring its characters.ÌýLess is always more, but “Age of Ultron” follows a mantra of “more is more” — to exhausting effect.ÌýAfter the original cut clocked in at roughly three hours, the studio thankfully trimmed it to 141 minutes, but like Superman, this feels overlong.
Visual Appeal vs.ÌýGraphic Distraction
Length aside, the constant barrage of digital effectsÌýteeters betweenÌýimpressive and distracting.
The frenetic, computer-generatedÌýstyle is established right fromÌýthe opening battle. Here, Whedon gives us a digitalÌýsingle take in a snowy forest, swooping aroundÌýto introduce each Avenger in action, delivering a Hulk Smash here, a hammer crash there, a shield throw here, a crossbow arrow there.
Instantly, you’ll knowÌýwhether you’re game for this style, whichÌýlooks more like a video game than it does cinema. There’s even a point whereÌýThor does a “double jump” like “Super MarioÌý64,”Ìýleaping into the air, then kicking into another gear to propel even further. In the landÌýof theÌýsuperheroes, this is a far cry fromÌýthe cinematic language of a Best Picture winner like “Birdman” (2014).
Still, there’s plenty to respect about Whedon’s vision. HeÌý“kitchen sinks” the hell out of this one, pouring his blood, sweat and tears into a visual experience. HeÌýdeserves creditÌýforÌýa number of brilliant moments, ranging from the calm to the frantic, cutting to black at the peaceful birth of Ultron, then quick-cutting a series ofÌýtrippy nightmare sequences, introducing each character’s fears in a “Rosemary’s Baby” (1968) style of jump cuts, changing filmÌýspeeds and horrifying visuals.
Whedon isn’t phoning it in at all; he’s throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks.
In the end, the good outweighs the bad — but barely. It’s an above-average movie with enough talent toÌýkeep us engaged and enough banter to keep usÌýamused. Above all, it’s a thrill to see the star-studded cast reunite in a genre they defined and a release strategyÌýthey invented. As the credits roll with a mid-credits teaser to the next installment, we get the feeling that several of our heroesÌýwill be taking a much deserved break, while others will be promoted for their own new adventures.
This is also the last hurrah for Whedon, who retires from the franchiseÌýlike anÌýathlete who just left it all on the court but knowsÌýhis time is fleeting.ÌýToward the end, he inserts a hallowed scene where UltronÌýandÌýVision discuss the fate of humanity as anÌýanalogy for the Avengers place in theÌýHollywood studio system.ÌýWhedonÌýinsists that it’sÌýdoomed, but it’s a pleasure being part of it while he can.
As Ultron quips, “Keep your friends rich, and your enemies rich,Ìýand then find out which is which.”
★ ★ 1/2
The above rating is based on a 4-star scale: 4 = potential masterpiece, 3.5 = great movie, 3 = good movie, 2.5 = above-average flick, 2 = disappointingly mediocre, 1.5 = don’t waste your time, 1= terrible movie. See where this film ranks in ourÌý. Follow himÌýon Twitter .Ìý
