WASHINGTON 鈥� The General Services Administration’s inspector general will review the agency’s decision to scrap a longtime plan to relocate the FBI鈥檚 headquarters to the D.C. suburbs.
Rep. Gerald E. Connolly 鈥� one of several legislators who strongly criticized the move 鈥� announced the decision Wednesday.
鈥淚 am pleased Inspector General [Carol] Ochoa has launched a review of the GSA鈥檚 FBI headquarters decision,鈥� said Connolly, a Democrat representing Virginia鈥檚 11th District.
鈥�… The public deserves answers, and I am hopeful the inspector general will get to the bottom of this,鈥� he said Wednesday in a statement.
In a Feb. 28 letter to Ochoa seeking the review, Connolly requested more details about what GSA analyzed in making the decision, including matters regarding long-term costs of the new plan, security, timeliness and the benefits of moving staff. He also asked if 鈥渃ommunications from outside sources鈥� were considered.
Last month, the GSA confirmed it would no longer seek a secure, modern campus that consolidates its personnel of about 11,000. Potential sites had included Springfield, Virginia, and Greenbelt and Landover in Prince George鈥檚 County, Maryland.
It was an abrupt change to plans going back to the George W. Bush administration. Prior to the about-face, the GSA 鈥� which handles federal real estate 鈥� had said that renovating or rebuilding on the Hoover site was cost-prohibitive.
The new plan keeps about 8,300 employees in the area 鈥� at the bureau鈥檚 academy in Quantico, Virginia, and at a new structure on the site of the crumbling J. Edgar Hoover Building. About 2,300 other FBI personnel would be relocated to new facilities in Huntsville, Alabama; Pocatello, Idaho; and Clarksburg, West Virginia.
During a Feb. 15 hearing with members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, that there were insufficient appropriations for the suburb plan, which was billed at about $3.6 billion. The FBI later revised its requirements, lowering the estimated price tag to $3.3 billion 鈥� and widening the bureau鈥檚 options.
That hearing testimony had left Connolly unconvinced.
鈥淚t was deeply troubling that at our [House] Oversight and Government Committee hearing, GSA leaders were unable or unwilling to answer very basic questions about the abrupt change in scope, security requirements and costs of this project,” Connolly said in Wednesday’s statement.
In a statement, GSA spokeswoman Pamela Dixon aid the GSA “welcomes oversight of GSA鈥檚 Office of Inspector General and is working with OIG on its review of the joint decision made by GSA and the FBI.”
