²ÝÝ®´«Ã½

Report: D.C. region remains fittest in nation

WASHINGTON — A new report names the D.C. region the fittest of the 50 biggest metropolitan areas in the country, based on a combination of health and lifestyle factors, for the second year in a row.

The American College of Sports Medicine and the Anthem Foundation released theÌý data Tuesday.

It’s an annual ranking of the fifty largest metropolitanÌý areas of the country, using data from a wide range of sources — from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to the Trust for Public Land.

The Washington area is followed by Minneapolis-St. Paul and San Diego. Indianapolis, Indiana, sits at the bottom of the list.

“It’s a veryÌýcomprehensive index,” says ,Ìý the Georgia State University professor who was the lead author of the annual fitness survey, which is sponsoredÌý by the American College of Sports Medicine and the Anthem Foundation.

“The Washington, D.C. area ranksÌýNo. 1Ìýon our list for community and economic indicators,” he says.

Those indicators are things the regionÌý does to support fitness, like providing resources for parks and pools, and providing incentives for people to walk or bike to work.

When it comes to indicators related to personal health — like smoking and diet — the region scores a bit lower, coming in at No. 4.ÌýÌýÌý But crunchÌý the more than 30 indicators together, and D.C. is clearly in first place.

Thompson says one clear example of just how good the D.C.ÌýareaÌýis, isÌýin the amount of money localÌýgovernments devote to parks.ÌýÌýÌýThe average for the top 25 cities on the American Fitness Index is $100 per capita.ÌýÌý In the D.C. metropolitan region, it’s $300.

In Indianapolis it’s $27 per capita on parks.

The , which for the purposes of the study includes the surrounding counties and more, scores high on factors such as a low percentage of people with cardiovascular and heart disease; people who get to work by means other than driving, and a high per-capita number of swimming pools, tennis courts and farmers markets.

The region also topped the list in 2009 and 2010, and placed second to Minneapolis-St. Paul from 2011 to 2013.

But nationally there is good news and bad news in the 8th annual American Fitness Index.ÌýÌýThere’s been a drop in the percentage of people who told researchers they had exercised in the last 30 days, fruit consumption is down a bit, and there has been a 7.8 percent increase in theÌýdeath rate from diabetes from 2014 to 2015.

On the bright side, ÌýThompson notes child obesity rates are starting to fall, and more people at least seem aware of the benefits of regular exercise.

to view the city-specific data and ranking.

Here’s how the cities rank:

 

Rank Metropolitan Area Score
1 79.6
2 75.6*
3 75.6*
4 72.6
5 71.4
6 71.1
7 69.6
8 68.5
9 68.1
10 65.9
11 64.8
12 61.9
13 60.1
14 57.5*
15 57.5*
16 56.4
17 56.3
18 55.0
19 54.5
20 54.2
21 53.0
22 52.5
23 52.0
24 50.9
25 50.5*
26 50.5*
27 50.2
28 49.4
29 48.1
30 47.5
31 47.4
32 47.3
33 46.8
34 44.8
35 43.5
36 42.7
37 41.1
38 41.0
39 39.8
40 39.0
41 38.8
42 38.6
43 37.4
44 34.5
45 33.0
46 32.1
47 32.0
48 29.6
49 27.3
50 26.

Ìý

Ìý²ÝÝ®´«Ã½’s Paula Wolfson contributed to this report.Ìý

Federal ²ÝÝ®´«Ã½ Network Logo
Log in to your ²ÝÝ®´«Ã½ account for notifications and alerts customized for you.