This content was republished with permission from 草莓传媒鈥檚 news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for聽听迟辞诲补测.
Advocates for the revival of a scuttled Baltimore-area subway line said on Wednesday they welcome efforts by Maryland鈥檚 U.S. senators to help get the project back on track.
But they said their enthusiasm is tempered by the sober reality that many pieces would need to fall into place for the resurrection of the Red Line project, which was canceled by Gov. Lawrence J. Hogan Jr. (R) in 2015, to occur.
This week Sens. Chris Van Hollen (D) and Ben Cardin (D) were able to add a provision to the infrastructure legislation being debated in Congress 鈥渢hat would ensure consideration of projects previously in the [federal transportation funding] program, such as the Red Line,鈥� the lawmakers said.
Without such a provision, the project would be forced to endure a much longer wait for federal funding should a future governor seek to revive it.
鈥淚 think it is significant,鈥� said Brian O鈥橫alley, head of the Central Maryland Transportation Alliance. 鈥淭his clears a hurdle, but it鈥檚 not the only hurdle.鈥�
After years of debate and design work, the 14-mile Red Line was set to connect Woodlawn, in Baltimore County, with Bayview, in the eastern part of Baltimore City.
Hogan, who campaigned against the project, killed it just six months into his first term, calling it 鈥渁 wasteful boondoggle.鈥�
Backers of the project howled in protest.
They said the long-planned line, which qualified for $900 million in federal funding, would have聽聽for thousands of people.
Transportation advocates cautioned on Wednesday that a revival faces numerous challenges.
From a political perspective, they said, the line needs to become an issue in the 2022 race for governor 鈥� and that Hogan鈥檚 successor would need to champion the project鈥檚 return.
State and city transportation officials would then need to dust off and update engineering work that was done, re-do time-consuming environmental analyses, and take into account neighborhood development that has occurred since 2015.
The state would also need to successfully re-compete for the federal funding that almost all big-ticket transit projects require to get off the ground.
Van Hollen said Hogan鈥檚 decision to kill the project sacrificed 鈥測ears and years of effort and communities coming together for that common purpose.鈥�
鈥淚t鈥檚 very unusual that 鈥� after so much work has gone into planning for a big Metro system like that 鈥� that a governor would turn his back on the project,鈥� he added.
The lawmaker noted that if Hogan hadn鈥檛 killed the Red Line, it would possibly be nearing completion.
The provision added by Van Hollen and Cardin, the chairman of the Environment and Public Works Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee, means 鈥淏altimore City doesn鈥檛 have to go to the back of the line if it wants to restart the Red Line.鈥�
Del. Robbyn T. Lewis (D-Baltimore City), a longtime Red Line advocate, said she was 鈥渂oth super excited and traumatically cautious鈥� about this week鈥檚 news.
She said residents would need to 鈥渕obilize鈥� to get regional and state leaders behind the project again, which she said would be a heavy lift.
鈥淲e absolutely need a new governor and it needs to be a Democrat who gives a s鈥� about Baltimore,鈥� Lewis said.
Cal Harris, the communication director for Baltimore Mayor Brandon M. Scott (D), called the cancellation of the Red Line 鈥渁 regrettable missed opportunity,鈥� and he praised the senators for keeping the door to revival ajar.
鈥淭heir effort to revive the Red Line project aligns with the Scott Administration鈥檚 commitment to strengthening transportation infrastructure, creating jobs, and building a more equitable Baltimore,鈥� Harris said in a statement.
Funding for DC Metro secured
Van Hollen said the Senate version of the infrastructure bill includes other 鈥渂ig wins鈥� for the state, including:
- Reauthorization of $150 million per year in federal funds for the Washington Metropolitan Area鈥檚 Transit Authority, the entity that provides subway and bus service in the D.C. region.
- Provisions of the 鈥淩econnecting Communities Act, which seeks to remove infrastructure projects like Baltimore鈥檚 鈥淗ighway to Nowhere鈥� that divide neighborhoods.
- $238 million in funding for the EPA鈥檚 Chesapeake Bay Program to help meet pollution-reduction targets.
- Provisions to protect frontline transit workers and commuters.
- $42 billion to expand broadband access and make internet service more affordable for low-income Americans.
- $8 billion for a Federal Transit Administration program that supports the Purple Line and similar projects.
- $17 billion to improve the nation鈥檚 ports.
鈥淎s we work to beat this pandemic and build a stronger and more inclusive economy, we must seize this opportunity to generate more good-paying jobs, tackle the climate crisis, and ensure that every American has a chance for a bright future,鈥� the senator said in statement.
