States will share $10 billion for rural health care next year in a program that aims to offset the Trump administration’s , federal officials announced Monday.
But while every state applied for money from the Rural Health Transformation Program, it won’t be distributed equally. And critics worry that the funding might be pulled back if a state’s policies don’t match up with the administration’s.
Officials said the average award for 2026 is $200 million, and the fund puts a total of $50 billion into rural health programs over five years. States propose how to spend their awards, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services assigns project officers to support each state, said agency administrator .
鈥淭his fund was crafted as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill, signed only six months ago now into law, in order to push states to be creative,” Oz said in a call with reporters Monday.
Under the program, half of the money is equally distributed to each state. The other half is allocated based on a formula developed by CMS that considered rural population size, the financial health of a state鈥檚 medical facilities and health outcomes for a state鈥檚 population.
The formula also ties $12 billion of the five-year funding to whether states are implementing health policies prioritized by the Trump administration’s 鈥淢ake America Healthy Again鈥 initiative. Examples include requiring nutrition education for health care providers, having schools participate in the or , Oz said.
Several Republican-led states 鈥 including Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Texas 鈥 have already adopted rules banning the purchase of foods like candy and soda with SNAP benefits.
The money that the states get will be recalculated annually, Oz said, allowing the administration to 鈥渃law back鈥 funds if, for example, state leaders don’t pass promised policies. Oz said the clawbacks are not punishments, but leverage governors can use to push policies by pointing to the potential loss of millions.
鈥淚’ve already heard governors express that sentiment that this is not a threat, that this is actually an empowering element of the One Big Beautiful Bill,” he said.
Carrie Cochran-McClain, chief policy officer with the National Rural Health Association, said she鈥檚 heard from a number of Democratic-led states that refused to include such restrictions on SNAP benefits even though it could hurt their chance to get more money from the fund.
鈥淚t鈥檚 not where their state leadership is,鈥 she said.
Experts say fund is inadequate in face of other cuts
Oz and have touted the program as a 50% increase in Medicaid investments in rural health care. Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican from Nebraska who has been critical of many of the administration鈥檚 policies but voted for the budget bill that slashed Medicaid, pointed to the fund when recently questioned about how the cuts would hurt rural hospitals.
鈥淭hat鈥檚 why we added a $50 billion rural hospital fund, to help any hospital that鈥檚 struggling,鈥 Bacon said. 鈥淭his money is meant to keep hospitals afloat.鈥
But experts say it won’t nearly offset the losses that struggling rural hospitals will face from the federal spending law’s $1.2 trillion cut from the federal budget over the next decade, primarily from Medicaid. Millions of people are also expected to lose Medicaid benefits.
Estimates suggest rural hospitals could lose around over the next decade because of the budget measure. As many as 300 rural hospitals were at risk for closure because of the GOP鈥檚 spending package, according to an by The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
鈥淲hen you put that up against the $50 billion for the Rural Health Transformation Fund, you know 鈥 that math does not add up,鈥 Cochran-McClain said.
She also said there’s no guarantee that the funding will go to rural hospitals in need. For example, she noted, one state鈥檚 application included a proposal for healthier, locally sourced school lunch options in rural areas.
And even though innovation is a goal of the program, Cochran-McClain said it’s tough for rural hospitals to innovate when they were struggling to break even before Congress鈥 Medicaid cuts.
鈥淲e talk to rural providers every day that say, 鈥業 would really love to do x, y, z, but I鈥檓 concerned about, you know, meeting payroll at the end of the month,鈥欌 she said. 鈥淪o when you鈥檙e in that kind of crisis mode, it is, I would argue, almost impossible to do true innovation.鈥
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute鈥檚 Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Copyright © 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.