草莓传媒

Ethics panel at center Prince George’s school board feud resigns

This article was republished with permission from 草莓传媒’s news partners at .聽Sign up for today.

This content was republished with permission from 草莓传媒鈥檚 news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for today.

The ethics panel that produced a controversial set of findings against members of the Prince George鈥檚 County Board of Education is stepping down en masse.

The panel notified board chair Juanita D. Miller of their intention to resign as a group in an that was obtained by Maryland Matters. The departures will take effect on Friday and will leave the board, which has been dogged by allegations of misconduct, without ethics overseers.

The school board鈥檚 ethics panel is made of five county residents who serve without compensation. The panel produced a confidential set of 鈥渇indings鈥 against seven of the board鈥檚 14 members last year. The members named in the documents vigorously rejected allegations of wrongdoing, and the public release of the reports 鈥 which were mailed anonymously to elected leaders 鈥 sparked months of controversy.

Critics of the seven-member bloc viewed the findings as cause for their removal; defenders of the group saw the investigation as a politically motivated smear. The reports deepened feelings of ill will between the members accused of wrongdoing and a slightly smaller bloc that tended to side with Miller.

In their letter, members of the ethics panel said their service forced them to deal with a school board that is 鈥渟een by many, including the State [Board of Education], as dysfunctional.鈥 They also complained that members of the board 鈥渋gnored鈥 their requests for information and of attempting to 鈥渓itigate Ethics Panel Findings in the press.鈥

Notably, the panel also cited a previously unreported 鈥渋nvestigation鈥 by the Maryland Office of the Inspector General for Education.

Asked on Tuesday if he is investigating the ethics panel, Inspector General Richard Henry declined to comment. 鈥淚 can鈥檛 discuss any investigations that we have or have not (launched),鈥 he said.

In an interview, Gregory T. Morton, a Bowie attorney who led the panel, defended the 2021 findings that were leveled against members of the school board.

鈥淚 know that everybody on the panel 鈥 while we were put through a lot 鈥 we all feel that what we left behind, in terms of our service, helped move things forward in the county,鈥 he said.

Miller attempted to forward the panel鈥檚 findings to the state board of education for potential action, but she lacked the votes to do so. Subsequent board meetings were occasionally chaotic, as Miller, a former state delegate appointed by County Executive Angela D. Alsobrooks (D), fought what she perceived to be a challenge to her leadership.

The board lost several attorneys, one of whom quit in the middle of a board meeting. Some of the board members accused of wrongdoing hired a lawyer.

In a March 21 letter to Leslie R. Stellman, a lawyer who served as an investigator for the ethics panel, Andrew W. Nussbaum, an attorney retained by the school board, said that after reviewing state law, he was of the opinion that ethics panel members would be represented by the county in the event they are sued.

鈥淸I]f a member, or former member, of the Ethics Panel were to be sued for something that arose as a result of activities of the Ethics Panel, the Board of Education would be required to provide counsel, at School System鈥檚 expense, to the individual鈥︹ Nussbaum wrote, 鈥渁nd that any judgment that might arise from such litigation could only be levied against the Board of Education and may not be executed against the Ethics Panel member.鈥

Miller declined to comment Tuesday about the ethics panel鈥檚 mass resignation.

One of the school board members accused of wrongdoing, Edward Burroughs II, now sits on the county council. In an interview, he accused the ethics panel of misconstruing documents in a manner that was 鈥渟o blatant.鈥

鈥淲hat they attempted to do was so unethical, in my opinion. And it didn鈥檛 work,鈥 he said.

Three board members named in the report have moved on. Burroughs left to run for the council seat that came open when Monique Anderson-Walker resigned. Belinda Queen stepped down to focus on her county council campaign. Raaheela Ahmed left to pursue a state Senate seat.

As Alsobrooks appoints new board members, it becomes possible that Miller will soon have the votes needed to refer the ethics reports to the state board of education for potential action.

Morton, the departing ethics chair, suggested that the panel鈥檚 findings may yet prompt action by state overseers.

鈥淚t鈥檚 not done. It鈥檚 not over,鈥 he said. 鈥淲e did our part. We鈥檙e convinced we did the right thing. And at the end of the day, it鈥檚 up to our county executive, our legislators and the state to really try to figure this thing out. We stand by what we said.鈥

Federal 草莓传媒 Network Logo
Log in to your 草莓传媒 account for notifications and alerts customized for you.