WASHINGTON 鈥� I鈥檓 starting to think Rob Manfred has no idea what he鈥檚 doing.
Well, that鈥檚 not entirely accurate. I鈥檝e always suspected it to be true, but was willing to give the MLB commissioner the benefit of the doubt. But this offseason, he鈥檚 approved the sale of one of his teams to an ownership group clearly financially incapable of operating it without a massive fire sale, which included jettisoning the league MVP. He鈥檚 obsessed about cutting a few minutes out of games鈥� run times instead of focusing on making the fun parts of the sport more accessible to the younger generation. And now, he鈥檚 taken the easiest public relations slam dunk 鈥� finally dumping the archaic, offensive Chief Wahoo mascot 鈥� and clanged the ball off the back rim.
On Monday, that the Cleveland Indians will stop using the caricature, saying the team has agreed with the league that 鈥渢he logo is no longer appropriate for on-field use in Major League Baseball.鈥� In fact, it鈥檚 so inappropriate that the team will stop using it 鈥� next year. Evidently it鈥檚 just fine for 2018, when it will still be worn on the field and merchandise featuring it still sold in the Cleveland area.
The cognitive dissonance here shatters any veneer of this move being made because it鈥檚, you know, the right thing to do. Getting rid of the logo was always going to be a business decision, but even as that, this one was thoroughly bungled. And both MLB and the Indians are going to pay the price for it this season.
Those of us in Washington, D.C.,聽. You know those guys, the ones who dress up in face paint and feathers? They鈥檙e going to be out in force this year. The anti-protest signs you saw at NFL games this fall? There will be plenty more of those in the stands at the ironically named Progressive Field this season, but for standing up against political correctness.
“Actually, it’s NOT offensive and I’ll tell you why my friend”
鈥� Trill Withers (@TylerIAm)
Oh, and the Indians are probably going to be a playoff team again, so get ready for this drama to play out on a national stage in October.
All of this was avoidable. The best decision clearly would have been to dump the logo a long time ago, like when Manfred took over from Bud Selig鈥檚 tenure three years ago. The next best option would have been to dump it this offseason. It鈥檚 not like you need a year to phase it out 鈥� this is not solar power replacing the coal industry. The Atlanta Braves , saw the , and all in a matter of six weeks.
Let鈥檚 take the morality out of this and look at it purely from a business standpoint. This is not difficult. If you really had to wait until the end of the season to do this, why not just announce it then, letting the offseason and news from other sports wash away the backlash while the stadium sits empty all winter?
I understand that, due to trademark law, in order to keep other people from profiting off the logo, the team needs to keep the ability to sell merchandise featuring it in some regard. But the Indians are reportedly planning to sell merchandise all around northern Ohio this year, including at the ballpark itself. Seriously? How, exactly, does that help the situation?
As for the road forward out of this mess, the team and league need not look beyond their own sport or even their own team name for a model. When the minor league Spokane Indians were looking for a better way forward with their logo set 12 years ago, they did something novel 鈥� they . Their jerseys now include a logo printed in the Native Salish language of the Spokane Tribe.
Perhaps, Commissioner Manfred could take a page out of Spokane鈥檚 book, not just in terms of the idea itself, but by getting out of his echo chamber in New York and actually listening to what baseball fans want. It鈥檚 hard to imagine the results could be any worse than what he鈥檚 come up with so far.
